Page 107 - Modelisation du devenir des pesticides...
P. 107

3.5 Conclusion du chapitre



                   !!              "#$%&! "'%(!    &##!   $)*+,-./! $)*+,%01! %2,-./! %2,%01!
                   #)34!           567487!  94:5!  ;;48<!              ;=466!            =74=7!
                   2>,=9,10+!      56?468!  94:6!  @;7477!             5=4<<!            ;946=!
                   2>,=9,1*A!      56648;!  94:?!  ?4;9!               6647;!            =84<7!
                   2>,=9,1)*+!     56:4;5!  94:7!  @84?;!   =:457!     :?4?<!    ?:45<!  ==495!
                   BCD,10+!        578455!  @94=8!  =646<!             ;?49:!            ?:469!
                   BCD,1*A!        <9=47:! @564?5! 5694;:!             8:45<!            :;6469!
                   BCD,1)*+!       ;:;4?8!  @<4:?!  754==!             =747?!            58547=!
                   EC+/F*+F!-$!    556479!  94;?!  ;:46:!              ;;4=8!            ;?4<=!
                   (GHI*JK0D!L*I*1! 5;54:=!  9457!  5:47<!             6=468!            ==49?!

               Table 3.11 – statistical score obtained at Vredepeel for the sensistivity test ;
                              NRMSE (%) ;err (%) ; Mean (µg/dm ) ; SD Standard Deviation
                                                                      3
                              (µg/dm )
                                      3

               tested in Tiktak  69  and Vanclooster  71 , for both the calibrated and uncalibrated
               run, for 3 over the 6 available profiles. Bentazone profile estimated by Stics are
               relatively close to simulations performed with PLM    28 , which might be linked to
               the use of the same value for field capacity and wilting point. However, there are
               some deviations between the two models which may partly be attribute to the
               different adsorption and degradation parameters      28 . As already stated, the soil
               transfer in Stics is based on a capacity models (drainage occurs as soon the filed
               capacity is reached). Compared to other capacity models tested at Vredepeel, the
               bentazone residues predicted by Stics are better reproduce (i.e., less overestimated

               64,65 ). The statistical score obtained by Stics are in the range of the other ones,
               with the exception of the efficiency on the bentazone profiles that is in the range
               of uncalibrated values, but not in the range of the calibrated value, which is also
               consistent with the fact that the reference run with stics was not calibrated.



               3.5 Conclusion du chapitre

                  Les résultats et les discussions présentés dans ce chapitre ont mis en évidence
               la difficulté associée à l’évaluation du modèle sur différents sites et molécules aux
               caractéristiques contrastées.
                  Par ailleurs, la complexité de l’évaluation est renforcée par le caractère lacu-
               naire des jeux de données et la variété des méthodes d’acquisition utilisées sur les
               différents sites d’études.
                  Ce travail souligne également le manque de données sur les sites expérimentaux






                                                                                                95
   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112