Page 100 - Modelisation du devenir des pesticides...
P. 100

Chapitre 3 Evaluation du modèle STICS version pesticide sur différents sites
               expérimentaux
               similar for the 3 pesticides, since above 60% of pesticides have been degraded by
               120 DAA. The fraction of pesticide that is not degraded is either mostly stored in
               a non-equilibrium phase (for isoproturon and atrazine,) or leached downward (for
               bentazon). The behavior simulated between the top soil and the 1st soil meter is
               consistent with the observations at Vredepeel (Fig. 3.3.4), although the recovery
               mass is overestimated at 1m depth.


               3.3.6 Comparison with other pesticide fate models

                  Several pesticide models have already been tested with the dataset from Vre-
               depeel, Kerlavic or Grignon. The results obtained previously with the different
               pesticide transport models are compared to the STICS predictions below.




                     !!                   "#$%&!'()!                      &**+,+-.,/!
                                                                            ()*
                                                           (
                      !"#$#%##&' %012%!  '$+.!$34) !  '$-5+3.) !  %6+,7!  '$+.!$34) !  '$-5+3.) !
                                                                                         ()*
                                               (
                       D36-E!  AC:<<!  89:;<!6=!!88>:?8!  @A:>?!!  B>:A>!  BA:C@!6=!;:A<!  B;:@<!!
                                       F?:9!6=!?C:?G!  F>C:;CG!     FB@:AA!6=!;:?@G!  F;:<<G!
                      HE=I+5-!  8;C:CJ!  @@:A8!6=!>CA:C<!  A?:A<!  ;:8C!  BA:9A!;:<?!  ;:;8!
                                        FC9:8>!6=!
                                        8>>:>?G!     FJ@:C@G!       FB8:C<!6=!;:AAG!  F;:J@G!
                      H-.63K=.-! 88?:C@!   L!          L!     B>:9A!  BJ:A!6=!!;:<!  B;:?!
                                                                      FB8!6=!;:9G!   F;:JG!
                                                         !
                                                           5
                                                                             5
                                                                                          5
                                               5
                      +,-.#"./&0  %012%!  '$+.!$34) !  '$-5+3.) !  %6+,7!  '$+.!$34) !  '$-5+3.) !
                       1"-2343'
                       M6E3K+.-!  @8:9J!  J8:;!6=!A9:;!  <J:;!  ;:9J!  ;:J8!6=!;:A?!  ;:<A!
                                                         !
                                         6
                          !           H+37 !           L!       L!       L!           L!
                     7#"&/.-8'  %012%!  '$+.!$34)!     L!       L!       L!           L!
                      NE3+.3O-!  B>>:?!  B8@:?!6=!9:A!  L!      L!       L!           L!
                     17=PE=6QE=.! B?>BAA!  B@>:@!6=!88:<!  L!   L!       L!           L!

               Table 3.8 – Comparison of the statistical results obtained by Stics with other
                             pesticides models based on literature review analysis ; At Vredepeel
                             model efficiency and NRMSE are computed using only 3 sampling
                             dates the 103, 278 and 474 DAA ; and the values presented in bra-
                             ckets are the results of the simulations carried out with calibration ;
                             at Thiverval-Grignon, the values are computed on the top 10 cm ; at
                             Kerlavic, bias is provided for year 2002/2003. References are indica-
                             ted : 1(Boesten and Vanclooster 2000)71, 2 (Tiktak 2000)69, 3 (Baer,
                             1997), 4(Guimont, 2005)56.







               88
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105