Page 98 - Modelisation du devenir des pesticides...
P. 98

Chapitre 3 Evaluation du modèle STICS version pesticide sur différents sites
               expérimentaux


                      site       year      Mass      Trans     Sys       Leach     Err
                                           app       (%)       (%)       (%)       (%)
                                           (kg/ha)
                      Vredepeel  1990/91   0,63      73.97     1.02      25.08     0,07
                      Kerlavic   2002/03   1.25      80.80     18.80     0.15      0,15
                                 2003/04   1.25      83.20     16.98     0,05      0.23
                      Thiverval-  1993     0.94      82.50     17.52     ! 0.00    0.02
                      Grignon    1994      0.90      98.00     2.03      ! 0.00    0.03


               Table 3.7 – Mass balance of pesticide at the three study sites at 1m depth : Mass
                             app : Mass of pesticide applied, Trans : percentage of mass of pesti-
                             cide transformed (degradation) ; Sys : percentage left in the system
                             (liquid+adsorbed) ; Leach : percentage of liquid pesticide leached at
                             the bottom of the soil profile Err : numerical mass balance error


               the top soil 90 DAA compared to 52 and 72 % for isoproturon and atrazine. The
               lower impact of degradation is linked to the higher value of the DT50 (Table 3.4).
               In addition, the low temperature during winter at Vredepeel mayhave significantly
               reduce the degradation rate.
                  The evolution of the aeric mass of isoproturon and atrazine is first dominated
               by the linear adsorption process at Kerlavic and Thiverval-Grignon sites. However
               degradation becomes dominant at both sites 90 days after application with 52 and
               73% of the pesticides degraded respectively. Although the DT50 of isoproturon
               and atrazine are fairly similar, the dynamic of the degradation is different. This
               may be due firstly, to the slow adsorption process and secondly, to the temperature
               effect with warmer temperature at Thiverval-Grignon as the atrazine was applied
               in late spring. The non-equilibrium process used in the model takes the creation
               of bound residues into account. Consequently, this process has a larger impact
               on the fate of isoproturon and atrazine on long time period. Although it is a
               long-term process, the non-equilibrium adsorption shows different dynamics for
               isoptruron at Kerlavic and atrazine at Thiverval-Grignon.The larger Kneq_ads for
               atrazine first lead to a more larger fraction of adsorbed pesticide being adsorbed
               in the Neq phase (18% compared to 7% for isoproturon 30 DAA), but this is
               then compensated by a larger desorption, so that 120 DAA, the ratios are 19.5
               and 15.4% respectively. Comparison of the mass balance at 30 cm and 1m depth
               (Fig. 3.3.4) shows quite similar results for isoproturon and atrazine, but rather
               different results for Bentazone. As isoproturon and atrazine are mostly adsorbed
               and then degraded, most of the processes occur in the top soil. In contrast, the
               liquid fraction dominates for bentazon and is transferred rapidly to the deeper
               soil (10% 30 DAA and 70% 90 DAA). The mass balance at 1m depth is more





               86
   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103